Logo
programming4us
programming4us
programming4us
programming4us
Home
programming4us
XP
programming4us
Windows Vista
programming4us
Windows 7
programming4us
Windows Azure
programming4us
Windows Server
programming4us
Windows Phone
 
Windows Server

BizTalk 2010 Recipes : Document Mapping - Using Inline XSLT

- Free product key for windows 10
- Free Product Key for Microsoft office 365
- Malwarebytes Premium 3.7.1 Serial Keys (LifeTime) 2019
3/29/2011 3:32:56 PM

1. Problem

You need to map an incoming document with a node containing a document that matches exactly the destination schema. All of the nodes in the source document need to be mapped in their entirety to the destination document. Both the source and the destination schemas have target namespaces, and the namespaces must be preserved.

2. Solution

By using inline XSLT within a Scripting functoid, you can create the target document with the appropriate nodes and the correct namespace. Listing 1 shows a sample input document.

Example 1. Sample Input Document for the Inline XSLT Example
<ns0:SampleSource xmlns:ns0="http://Sample.Source">
<ID>ID_0</ID>
<Payload>
<SampleDestination>
<Name>Name_0</Name>
<Address>Address_0</Address>
<Company>Company_0</Company>
</SampleDestination>
</Payload>
</ns0:SampleSource>

The inline XSLT is written to parse the incoming document as a whole; there is no need to have an input to the Scripting functoid. The output of the Scripting functoid occurs under the node that the output is tied to—in this case, the XSLT output will be directly below the SampleDestination element. When XML documents contain namespaces, use the local-name() qualifier to reference a specific node by name. Because of the requirement that the namespaces be preserved, it is necessary to copy each of the nodes in the source document's Payload node (which consists of an Any element that can contain any XML structure) separately to the destination document.

Figure 1 shows the configuration for the Scripting functoid with the inline XSLT for the <Name> element. Additional nodes (such as Address and Company) can be added using the same code pattern. See Listing 2 for the XSLT code.

Example 2. XSLT Code
<xsl:if test="//*[local-name()='SampleDestination'])/*[local-name()='Name']">
<xsl:element name="Name">
<xsl:value-of select="//*[local-name()='SampleDestination']/*[local-name()='Name']"/>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:if>


Figure 1. Configuring the Scripting functoid to use inline XSLT

This XSLT script will produce the desired XML document on output, as shown in Listing 3.

Example 3. Sample Output Document for the Inline XSLT Example
<ns0:SampleDestination xmlns:ns0="http://Sample.Dest">
<Name>Name_0</Name>
<Address>Address_0</Address>
<Company>Company_0</Company>
</ns0:SampleDestination>

3. How It Works

The two expected solutions to this, the Mass Copy functoid or the <xsl:copy-of> function, both end up requiring additional logic and code outside the map due to the presence of the namespaces. These can be solved in orchestration mapping but not in maps outside orchestrations. An additional approach would be to reference an external XSLT file where more complex functions are available.

The Mass Copy functoid, designed specifically to copy entire documents to a destination node, is a graphic representation of the XSLT <xsl:copy-of> function. Both of these copy the entire source document to the destination document. The problem is that the source document namespace will be copied to the target document, regardless of the node level being copied. There is no simple way in XSLT to remove the source document namespace. For instance, if in the given solution for this recipe, the inline XSLT was changed to simply read:

<xsl:copy-of select="//*[local-name()='Payload']"/>

The following document would be created on output of the map (note that the root node contains the namespace of the source schema):

<Payload xmlns:ns0="Sample.Source">
<SampleDestination>
<Name>Name_0</Name>
<Address>Address_0</Address>
<Company>Company_0</Company>
</SampleDestination>
</Payload>

If a Mass Copy functoid were used on the Payload node, the following document would be produced (note that the root node repeats itself and that it contains the namespace of the source schema):

<ns0:SampleDestination xmlns:ns0="http://Sample.Dest">
<SampleDestination xmlns:ns0="http://Sample.Source">
<Name>Name_0</Name>
<Address>Address_0</Address>
<Company>Company_0</Company>
</SampleDestination>
</ns0:SampleDestination>

The output document for both of these approaches is not the desired outcome. However, if the mapping is being done in an orchestration, the output document will be in a message that can now be accessed and corrected in a Message Assignment shape, using the code in Listing 4.

Example 4. Message Assignment
// xmlDoc is a variable of type System.Xml.XmlDocument()
// msgSampleDestination contains the output of the map

// xpath will access the contents of the SampleDestination node
xmlDoc = xpath(msgSampleDestination, "/*/*");

// populate the message
msgSampleDestination = xmlDoc;

Another option would be to move the entire solution to an external XSLT document, where more complex functions such as templates are available, and reference it in the map directly rather than using the mapping functions. This can be done by selecting properties on the map being developed and indicating the path to the XSLT file in the Custom XSLT Path property.

NOTE

One of the greatest skills in BizTalk mapping is becoming proficient with XSLT. Functoids are great, but knowing how to code is even better! Do yourself a favor and learn how to apply Inline XSLT scripting to your maps. You will be astounded at how much easier it is to write a map that is intelligent and maintainable.

In summary, a number of approaches can be taken to map an incoming document with a node containing a document that matches exactly the destination schema. The cleanest and most viable approach is described in this recipe's solution. Quicker and more convoluted solutions involve using the Mass Copy functoid and <xsl:copy-of> function. An additional approach is to move the mapping completely out of the map into a separate XSLT document. The appropriate solution must be decided by the developer.

Other -----------------
- BizTalk 2010 Recipes : Document Mapping - Passing Orchestration Variables into Maps
- Windows Server 2003 : Designing a Server Cluster (part 2)
- Windows Server 2003 : Designing a Server Cluster (part 1) - Designing a Server Cluster Deployment & Planning a Server Cluster Hardware Configuration
- SharePoint 2010 PerformancePoint Services : Understanding and Working with Scorecards (part 2)
- SharePoint 2010 PerformancePoint Services : Understanding and Working with Scorecards (part 1) - Creating KPIs with the Scorecard Wizard
- Securing Exchange Server 2010 with ISA Server : Monitoring ISA from the ISA Console (part 2)
- Securing Exchange Server 2010 with ISA Server : Monitoring ISA from the ISA Console (part 1) - Customizing the ISA Dashboard
- Securing Exchange Server 2010 with ISA Server : Logging ISA Traffic
- Securing Exchange Server 2010 with ISA Server : Managing and Controlling Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) Traffic
- BizTalk 2010 Recipes : Document Mapping - Calling Compiled Assemblies
 
 
Top 10
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Finding containers and lists in Visio (part 2) - Wireframes,Legends
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Finding containers and lists in Visio (part 1) - Swimlanes
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Formatting and sizing lists
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Adding shapes to lists
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Sizing containers
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Control Properties and Why to Use Them (part 3) - The Other Properties of a Control
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Control Properties and Why to Use Them (part 2) - The Data Properties of a Control
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Control Properties and Why to Use Them (part 1) - The Format Properties of a Control
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Form Properties and Why Should You Use Them - Working with the Properties Window
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Using the Organization Chart Wizard with new data
 
programming4us
Windows Vista
programming4us
Windows 7
programming4us
Windows Azure
programming4us
Windows Server